Adelaide March: The Six-Minute Speech Mainstream Media Won't Touch
October 19, 2025 | Adelaide, South Australia
While corporate media focuses on arrests, labels and division, they're ignoring the content that has tens of thousands talking
Nationwide, rallies drew significant crowds in every major city, with organizers reporting hundreds of thousands in attendance across the country. The marches represent growing public frustration with what participants describe as unsustainable immigration levels and government policies that prioritize global interests over local sovereignty.
Adelaide March Speakers And Attendance
An estimated 7,500 people gathered in Adelaide at Light Square on Sunday, 19th of October, 2025 for the second grass-roots nationwide March for Australia event, part of coordinated demonstrations across every state capital protesting current immigration and governance policies.
The Adelaide march began at Light Square, proceeding up West Terrace before circling around back towards Light Square. One woman was arrested for public disorder.
Four speakers addressed the Adelaide crowd:
-
Tyler Green, Libertarian Party representative
-
Carlos Quaremba, One Nation
-
Paul Morrell, People First Party
-
Lord Albert Marashi, independent social media commentator
While mainstream outlets devoted extensive coverage to political party representatives and protest logistics, one speech has been conspicuously absent from media reports despite generating significant organic social media engagement.
Independent Speaker Buried
A speaker, father and independent commentator with no political party affiliation or lobby funding, identifying as Lord Albert Marashi, delivered what attendees were calling "the most honest speech" of the rally. He opened with a declaration that would set the tone for everything that followed:
Good afternoon Adelaide, I'm Lord Albert Marashi. I'm not here representing any political party. I am just here to represent reality itself.
The Root Case
Unlike other speakers who focused on immigration statistics, Marashi immediately reframed the entire issue:
Immigration has been one of the largest issues facing our nation, but it is merely a symptom of a much greater cause. The real problem is that government has been captured—not by immigrants, but by money, lobbyists, banks, foreign parasitical globalists who buy out politicians like prostitutes.
This opening salvo accomplished something rare in political discourse: it named a specific enemy while simultaneously defending against accusations of xenophobia. The problem isn't people crossing borders — it's the system that opened those borders for profit.
The UK Parallel
Marashi then drew attention to events overseas that Australian media has largely declined to cover in detail:
Raise your hand if you've been hearing about what's going on in the UK.
Marashi stated, with a large majority of the crowd raising their hands in response. He continued:
Hundreds of thousands of young British girls raped by migrant gangs. Police and councils covering it up for decades, with 12,000 British citizens arrested in 2023 for social media posts about it. And what does the regime do?
They arrest more citizens, bring more migrants, hand them free iPhones in hotels at taxpayers' dollar, while the British people starve.
So what's going on? Why is every white western country being invaded by millions of third world migrants? Worse, why are the governments of these nations not dealing with this problem? In fact, why are they encouraging it? Why arresting those who speak out against it and covering up the crimes?
We're really all here gathered today because we're sick and tired of spineless leaders who continue to sell our countries to parasitical globalists.
The crowd's response — a roar of recognition—suggested this wasn't news to them. It was validation that someone was finally willing to say it publicly.
The Biological Framework
Then came the section that is difficult for critics to effectively counter:
Let me give you a simple truth that every living organism knows instinctively.
The body does not negotiate with parasites.
When a tick attaches to your skin and starts sucking your blood:
Do you have a conversation with it?
Do you ask nicely to stop?
Try and understand its perspective?
Or worry about being called anti-tick?
No. You rip it off because you love your body more than being called names by parasites.
The framing is devastatingly simple: self-preservation isn't hatred. It's love.
Likewise, the immune system doesn't hate the virus. Your immune system loves you so much that it's willing to annihilate anything threatening your survival. And this isn't hate. This is not vengeance. It's just love.
The Call and Respone
Marashi then engaged the crowd directly:
Hear what they don't want you to understand...
What is a cell without a membrane: Dead
What is a body without skin: Dead
What is a nation without borders?"
Marashi asked the crowd, with the crowd letting the conclusion speak for itself.
The approach bypassed traditional political divisions, with attendees from diverse backgrounds expressing appreciation. The biological truth had become a collective realization. Thousands of people simultaneously understood: borders aren't optional features of nations. They're survival requirements.
The biological framework proved both scientifically inarguable and emotionally resonant. Marashi framed strong borders and immigration policies not as hatred of outsiders, but as love of self — comparing it to how the immune system removes threats not from malice, but from care for the body.
Social Media Reaction
Marashi posted his speeches on social media platforms. In 24 hours, his speech on x.com, garnered over 6,374 views, with 69 reposts and 237 likes, and on TikTok, 11.5K views, 123 shares, with 92 comments.
His posts received largely unanimous overwhelming support from public commenters and sentiment, with some users on TikTok commenting:
Brother, this speech today expressed the thoughts we all have every single day, thanks for putting it into words & standing tall doing so, god bless 🙏
You said what the majority of us are thinking, well said
Yesss was waiting for someone to talk about this! 👏👏👏
Even critics attempting to engage with the content find themselves arguing on Marashi's terms. One commenter wrote:
The housing crisis isn't caused by immigration. It's driven by land banking, Airbnbs taking over livable homes, and mega-landlords treating housing as an investment, not a necessity.
The criticism inadvertently reinforces Marashi's central thesis: the system has been captured by financial interests. Immigration is indeed a symptom, not the root cause — exactly what the speech argued.
The Inversion
Having established the scientific and moral basis for national defense, Marashi then addressed the predictable attacks:
And yet what do they call us when we defend our borders? Racist, xenophobic, far-right extremists, hateful, Nazis...
Let me tell you something:
I'm not hateful because I want my nation to survive. I am loving.
I love that my people get to exist.
I love that my son will get to live in a country where he has a future.
I love that young couples looking to raise kids get to afford homes.
And I love that children don't have to be raped and stabbed by third world migrants.
The crowd roared in support of his statements.
The Surveillance State
Perhaps most provocatively, Marashi directed part of his speech toward police and law enforcement present at the event, drawing on a recent personal encounter where police visited his home regarding social media posts.
He pivoted to address what many in the crowd likely didn't realize: they were being watched.
Speaking of captured systems, mass surveillance. I want to speak directly to all of you gathered here today. I know you're watching, taking notes. Drones in the sky hovering silently, recording everything. But always remember:
The eyes of the LORD are in every place, keeping watch on evil and good
The Holy Bible, Proverbs 15:3.You are also under divine counter-surveillance - Marashi Quoted, from the Bible
The biblical reference served dual purposes: acknowledging the surveillance while asserting a higher authority that watches the watchers.
The Police Encounter
What followed may be the most remarkable section of the speech — a detailed account of state intimidation that simultaneously humanized the officers involved, with Marashi saying:
Some have of you have even been assigned to monitor me specifically.
A few weeks ago, some colleagues came to my door unannounced, in plain clothes — two officers and two mental health professionals.
They said they were concerned because of the things I'd posted online.
But I know what they were really doing there: assessing me, categorizing, looking for reasons to silence someone speaking truths too loud. Maybe to instill fear so I silence myself in paranoia.
You asked many questions to try and trap and categorize. Questions like whether I had an interest in explosives. I told them, answer truthfully: I have an interest in all areas of science. Whether it be chemistry or nuclear physics - But tell me, is knowledge illegal?
I could probably build a nuclear bomb if I wanted to...
Then came the line that has since become a rallying cry on social media:
Because the system fears minds that learn too deeply.
But no, the only bombs I manufacture are truth bombs.
And I don't detonate — I declare.
And the only thing my words are radioactive to are falsehoods and lies.
Each sentence I speak triggers a chain reaction of awakening.
But the most powerful revelation from Marashi came next:
At the end of the visit, I asked them:
Are you guys allowed to have opinions
For a moment they all froze, looking at each other like a program dealing with unexpected input...
One whispered: "Not if I want my money or my job"
Marashi claims when police visited his home to question and investigate him regarding his online social media presence, a police officer had admitted that law enforcement operates under ideological constraints. That maintaining employment requires suppressing personal political opinions.
The Auto-immune question.
Marashi then delivered an enduring metaphor towards police officers and enforcers:
You're supposed to be the immune system of our society
But what happens when the immune system gets reprogrammed?
What happens when it attacks the body's own healthy cells instead of foreign invaders?
That's called autoimmune disease., and the system is sick.
Then crucially: But I don't think the police are.
He separated the officers from the system. The disease isn't the cells — it's what's reprogrammed them. The metaphor left many in attendance — including some officers — visibly thoughtful.
Marashi then addressed law enforcement directly:
So I want to ask something to the police officers here today:
Who do you serve? Your boss, sergeant, commander?
But who does he serve? A minister, a politician who probably serves someone in Canberra. Who do they serve? The people?
With both Marashi the Crowd speaking in unison, he continued:
No... they don't serve us
Marashi continued:
So who do they serve?
Follow the chain. Follow the money and follow the orders.
Because somewhere at the end of that chain, someone is giving commands that have you investigating files on young adults for Twitter posts while actual criminals walk free.
So who are you really fighting for?
I know you have mortgages, bills, kids — you can't just quit. I'm not asking you to.
I'm just asking you to remember, to begin questioning.
To ask yourself before you follow the next order:
Is this protecting my people? Or is it protecting the captured system?
Am I the immune system, or have I become a disease?
The Forgiveness
What came next was unexpected — and strategically powerful, Marashi stated to the police:
And when that day comes, I forgive you. Because the system's power isn't violence — it's obedience.
At the moment enforcers stop enforcing, the whole captured system collapses
Prophecy Fulfilled
Marashi's strategic gambit of treating police as potential allies rather than enemies wasn't theoretical. Hours after his Adelaide speech concluded, events in Melbourne would vindicate his approach in the most dramatic way possible.
Victoria Police Commander Wayne Cheeseman held a press conference following violent clashes in Melbourne's CBD. His assessment shattered the media's preferred narrative:
People came to pick a fight with the police, the people that came to pick a fight with the police were the issue-motivated groups on the left
Cheeseman stated unequivocally. Then came the line that confirmed everything Marashi had argued:
I can tell you that the March for Australia group, they were peaceful, they were engaging, they listened to our instructions, they did what they were told, and they protested by example.
While police praised the nationalist demonstrators, the "anti-fascist" counter-protesters — who had styled themselves as defenders against hate and violence — attacked officers with rocks, glass bottles filled with shards of glass, and rotten fruit. Two officers were hospitalized: a sergeant with a suspected broken hand after being kicked, and a senior constable with a leg laceration. Victoria Police were forced to deploy tear gas, capsicum spray, stun grenades, and rubber bullets.
The contrast was devastating for the establishment narrative: the group labeled "far-right extremists" remained peaceful and cooperative. The group claiming moral authority to oppose "fascism" created chaos and attacked police.
The "robocop" warning from Marashi's speech proved prescient in another way: while he warned officers they'd be replaced by automation, the counter-protesters demonstrated they viewed police as expendable obstacles to be attacked. The nationalists, meanwhile, had just publicly acknowledged police humanity and offered them ideological common ground.
When Victoria Police had to choose which group represented order and which represented chaos, the choice was obvious.
For the first time in recent memory, Australian law enforcement publicly praised nationalist demonstrators while explicitly condemning left-wing activists. The autoimmune metaphor Marashi had deployed wasn't just rhetorical — it had become operational reality. The supposed defenders (counter-protesters) attacked the actual immune system (police), while the "threat" (nationalists) cooperated peacefully.
Speech Conclusion
He followed by saying:
And one more thing officers:
Don't be delusional
The elites you're protecting would replace you with robocops in a split second if they could...
The crowd laughed, clapped and cheering in response to the statement.
His final statement to the crowd and police was:
"You're enforcing a system that's planning to replace you"
"Which brings us back why why we're all gathered here today"
"We are all being replaced... We are all being betrayed by these same parasites, and the difference is we're not pretending anymore"
Due to speaking time limitations, Marashi was forced to end his speeches, with the event organizer being returned the microphone to provide concluding speeches for the event before Marashi could finish his entire speech.
The Analysis
While mainstream coverage focuses on who attended and what labels to apply, thousands of ordinary Australians are discussing a speech about cell membranes, immune systems, and self-love as an act of sovereignty.
The biological framework proves difficult to dismiss: it's scientifically accurate, morally defensible (framed in love rather than hate), and spiritually grounded (referencing divine design). Most importantly, it's accessible—requiring no political sophistication to understand that living things need boundaries to survive.
When asked about potentially running for parliament, Marashi responded in comments:
Thank you brother, we must all keep pushing forward. The battle is only getting started.
What the Media Won't Say
A comprehensive review of major Australian news outlets reveals extensive coverage of:
-
Arrest statistics at various rallies
-
Counter-protest activities and turnout
-
Political party spokesperson statements
-
Historical context of far-right movements
-
Police operational strategies
What's conspicuously absent:
any substantive reporting on the content of independent speakers' remarks. Not a single major outlet has quoted Marashi's speeches, his police encounter story, or his autoimmune metaphor — despite the features of his speeches garnering wide-spread public support and alignment on social media.
The silence appears strategic. The biological framework is scientifically accurate, the police critique comes from documented personal experience, and the autoimmune metaphor is morally neutral. There's no angle of attack that doesn't risk legitimizing the underlying arguments.
Meanwhile, the speech continues spreading organically on TikTok, X (previously Twitter), and through word-of-mouth, with engagement metrics suggesting it may reach into the hundreds of thousands regardless of traditional media gatekeeping.
The Broader Context
The October 19 marches occurred amid ongoing national debates about immigration policy, housing affordability, cost of living pressures, and questions about whether current governance structures adequately represent citizen interests.
Participants consistently described feeling unheard by political leadership, with many expressing frustration that concerns about rapid demographic change and economic pressure are dismissed as "racist" rather than addressed substantively.
Marashi's speech appeared to resonate precisely because it:
-
Named specific power structures rather than scapegoating immigrants
-
Used biological frameworks that bypass partisan programming
-
Framed defense as love rather than hate
-
Offered law enforcement an exit ramp from captured systems
-
Acknowledged real constraints (mortgages, families, jobs) while calling for moral courage
The combination proved devastatingly effective.
What Happens Next:
When asked on social media about potentially running for parliament, Marashi responded:
Thank you brother, we must all keep pushing forward. The battle is only getting started.
The language is revealing. Not "campaign." Not "election." Battle.
Whether that manifests as electoral politics, continued grassroots organizing, or expansion of independent media platforms remains to be seen. What's clear is that a growing segment of the Australian population is hungry for voices willing to speak uncomfortable truths—and they're finding those voices outside traditional channels.
The media's silence on this speech may be tactically sound in the short term. But strategically, it's an admission: they have no effective counter-narrative. The biological framework is too solid. The police encounter documented. The systemic critique too accurate.
With social media engagement continuing to climb and organizing calling for follow-up events on Australia Day, the question becomes whether independent voices outside traditional political and media structures can sustain momentum.
Questions That Remain
Marashi posed several questions during his speech that remain unanswered by authorities:
-
Why is every white western country experiencing similar migration patterns?
-
Why are governments encouraging what their citizens oppose?
-
Why are those speaking out being arrested while crimes are covered up?
-
Who do our enforcement systems ultimately serve?
-
Are police the immune system, or have they become the disease?
These aren't rhetorical questions. They're genuine inquiries about power, governance, and the disconnect between official policy and public interest.
The mainstream media won't ask them. The political establishment won't answer them.
But thousands of people in Adelaide — and hundreds of thousands watching online — are done waiting for permission to notice reality.
Editor's Note
This article reports on content from the October 19 Adelaide march that has been conspicuously absent from corporate media coverage despite significant public engagement. We believe citizens deserve access to the full range of perspectives expressed at public events, not just those deemed acceptable by media gatekeepers.
The views expressed by speakers do not necessarily reflect those of LightSquare.org, but we maintain that sunlight remains the best disinfectant — and that includes shining light on ideas the establishment prefers to keep in shadow.